House Roll Call

H.R.6644

Roll 57 • Congress 119, Session 2 • Feb 9, 2026 6:59 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call listView bill pageClerk recordAPI source

BillH.R.6644 — To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes
Vote questionOn Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Vote type2/3 Yea-And-Nay
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 390 / Nay 9 / Present 0 / Not Voting 33
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R1928018
D1981015
I0000

Research Brief

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended

Bill Analysis

HR 6644 – To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes
119th Congress – Summary (research-grade, concise)

Note: As of the latest available information, only the bill’s title and a procedural action (title amendment agreed to without objection) are public. No official text, section-by-section summary, or committee report is yet available. The following describes what can be inferred and what remains unknown.

Core purpose

  • The bill is expressly aimed at “increas[ing] the supply of housing in America,” indicating a focus on production and/or preservation of housing units rather than solely on rental assistance or demand-side subsidies.
  • The “and for other purposes” clause signals that the bill likely includes related provisions (e.g., financing, regulatory changes, or data/coordination measures) beyond pure construction support.

Substantive provisions (unknown)
Because the statutory language is not yet released, the following cannot be determined with specificity:

  • Whether the bill primarily uses:
    • Direct federal spending (e.g., grants to states/localities, capital subsidies, tax credits),
    • Regulatory reforms (e.g., incentives or conditions to reduce local zoning barriers), or
    • Federal credit programs (e.g., loan guarantees, expanded mortgage or multifamily lending authorities).
  • Whether it targets:
    • Affordable housing (e.g., low-income, extremely low-income, or workforce housing),
    • Market-rate supply generally, or
    • Specific submarkets (rural, tribal, senior, veteran, or homeless populations).

Funding and authorities (unknown)

  • No authorized appropriations, mandatory spending levels, or offsets are yet identifiable.
  • No amendments to specific statutes (e.g., the Housing Act of 1937, Cranston-Gonzalez, LIHTC provisions of the Internal Revenue Code) can be confirmed.
  • It is unclear whether the bill creates new programs or modifies existing HUD, USDA Rural Housing Service, Treasury, or FHFA authorities.

Agencies and stakeholders potentially affected (inferred)

  • Likely federal implementers: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), possibly USDA (rural housing), Treasury (tax incentives), and/or FHFA (GSE-related tools).
  • Potential beneficiaries: developers, state and local housing agencies, public housing authorities, nonprofit housing providers, and ultimately renters and homebuyers facing supply constraints.
  • Potentially regulated or conditioned: state/local governments (via land-use or permitting incentives/requirements tied to federal funds).

Timelines and implementation (unknown)

  • No effective dates, phase-ins, or sunset provisions are available without the bill text.

Yea (390)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Yea

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • Yea

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • Yea

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Yea

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • Yea

J
John Mannion

NY • D • Yea

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • Yea

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Yea

C
Christian Menefee

TX • D • Yea

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Yea

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Yea

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Yea

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • Yea

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • Yea

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • Yea

Nay (9)

Not Voting (33)

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Not Voting