House Roll Call

H.J.Res.142

Roll 56 • Congress 119, Session 2 • Feb 4, 2026 4:13 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call listView bill pageClerk recordAPI source

BillH.J.Res.142 — Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025
Vote questionOn Passage
Vote typeYea-and-Nay
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 215 / Nay 210 / Present 0 / Not Voting 7
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R 215 0 0 3
D 0 210 0 4
I 0 0 0 0

Research Brief

On Passage

Bill Analysis

H.J. Res. 142 is a joint resolution under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act that would nullify a specific D.C. law: the “D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025,” as approved by the D.C. Council.

Core function and legal effect

  • The resolution exercises Congress’s authority to review and disapprove D.C. legislation.
  • If enacted, it would prevent the temporary D.C. tax conformity and revision act from taking effect or continuing in effect (depending on timing), as if it had never become law.
  • This is a disapproval resolution, not a freestanding tax bill: it does not itself set tax rates or rules, but blocks D.C.’s chosen changes.

Scope and subject matter

  • The targeted D.C. act concerns the District’s income and franchise tax laws, including:
    • Conformity to federal Internal Revenue Code provisions (e.g., which tax year’s federal code D.C. “piggybacks” on).
    • Revisions to how individuals and businesses are taxed in the District.
  • The disapproval would maintain prior D.C. tax law rather than allowing the Council’s 2025 temporary revisions to operate.

Agencies and programs affected

  • Primary: District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue and related D.C. fiscal authorities administering income and business (franchise) taxes.
  • Indirectly: D.C. budget planning and any D.C. programs whose funding assumptions relied on revenue or distribution changes in the temporary act.

Who is affected

  • District residents and businesses subject to D.C. income and franchise taxes, whose tax treatment would remain under pre‑2025 rules rather than the Council’s updated framework.
  • D.C. government (Mayor, Council, Chief Financial Officer), whose tax policy discretion is constrained by congressional override.

Process, timing, and funding

  • As a joint resolution of disapproval, it must pass the House and Senate and be signed by the President (or enacted over veto) within the statutory review window for D.C. acts.
  • The measure does not authorize or appropriate federal funds; fiscal effects are indirect, via D.C.’s own tax base and revenue structure.
  • Latest procedural step: a House rule (H. Res. 1032) provides for floor consideration of H.J. Res. 142 under a closed rule, limiting amendments and expediting debate.

Yea (215)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Yea

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Yea

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Yea

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Yea

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Yea

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Yea

Nay (210)

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • Nay

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • Nay

J
John Mannion

NY • D • Nay

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • Nay

C
Christian Menefee

TX • D • Nay

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • Nay

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • Nay

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • Nay

Not Voting (7)

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • Not Voting

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Not Voting