H.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140

House Roll Call

H.Res.1009

Roll 35 • Congress 119, Session 2 • Jan 21, 2026 2:04 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call list • View bill page • Clerk record • API source

BillH.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140
Vote questionOn Agreeing to the Resolution
Vote typeRecorded Vote
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 213 / Nay 210 / Present 0 / Not Voting 8
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R213005
D021003
I0000

Research Brief

On Agreeing to the Resolution

Bill Analysis

H.Res. 1009 is a House procedural measure (a simple resolution) that sets the terms for floor consideration of three separate measures: H.R. 6945, H.R. 6359, and H.J. Res. 140. It does not itself change substantive law or appropriate funds, but it governs how and under what rules the House will debate and vote on those bills.

  1. H.R. 6945 – Use of TANF Funds for Pregnancy Centers

    • Amends part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, TANF).
    • Clarifies that states may use TANF block grant funds (and possibly related state maintenance-of-effort funds) to support pregnancy centers and similar entities that provide services to pregnant women.
    • Affects state human services agencies administering TANF and pregnancy resource centers that could receive funding.
    • Beneficiaries: low‑income pregnant women and families; regulated entities: state TANF programs.
    • The rule likely specifies debate time, amendment structure (e.g., “structured rule”), and whether points of order can be raised.

  2. H.R. 6359 – Information for Pregnant Students

    • Requires institutions of higher education (IHEs) to disseminate information on rights, accommodations, and resources for pregnant students.
    • Affects colleges and universities participating in federal student aid programs, and federal education oversight entities (e.g., Department of Education for implementation/guidance).
    • Beneficiaries: pregnant students and potentially parenting students.
    • The rule governs debate length, amendment process, and motion-to-recommit parameters.

  3. H.J. Res. 140 – Disapproval of BLM Public Land Order 7917

    • Uses the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. ch. 8) to disapprove a Bureau of Land Management rule implementing Public Land Order No. 7917, which withdraws specified federal lands in Cook, Lake, and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota, from certain uses.
    • Affects BLM and stakeholders in those federal lands (e.g., mining, local communities, conservation interests).
    • If enacted, the rule would be nullified and similar rules restricted.

Timeline: H.Res. 1009, once adopted by the House, immediately structures consideration of the three measures on the House floor, typically within the same legislative week. It does not require Senate or presidential action.

View bill source • Clerk record • API record

Yea (213)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Aye

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Aye

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Aye

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Aye

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Aye

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Aye

Nay (210)

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • No

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • No

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • No

J
John Mannion

NY • D • No

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • No

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • No

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • No

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • No

Not Voting (8)

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Not Voting