H.Res.294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
House Roll Call
H.Res.294
| Bill | H.Res.294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Ordering the Previous Question |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 213 / Nay 211 / Present 0 / Not Voting 9 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 213 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| D | 0 | 211 | 0 | 2 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Ordering the Previous Question
Bill Analysis
Bill Summary: HRES 294 (119th Congress)
HRES 294 is a resolution that outlines the procedures for the consideration of several legislative measures in the U.S. House of Representatives. It specifically addresses the following key components:
Disapproval of Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Rules: The resolution provides for the consideration of two joint resolutions (S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28) that seek to disapprove rules issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB).
- S.J. Res. 18 targets a rule concerning “Overdraft Lending” practices at very large financial institutions, aiming to limit or eliminate certain consumer protections related to overdraft fees.
- S.J. Res. 28 addresses the rule defining “Larger Participants” in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications, potentially impacting regulatory oversight of these financial technologies.
Amendments to Title 28, U.S. Code: The resolution includes provisions for the consideration of H.R. 1526, which seeks to amend Title 28 of the U.S. Code to restrict district courts’ authority to grant injunctive relief. This change could affect the judicial processes related to various federal regulations and enforcement actions.
Amendments to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993: H.R. 22, also included in this resolution, proposes to amend the National Voter Registration Act to require proof of U.S. citizenship for individuals registering to vote in federal elections. This measure could significantly impact voter registration processes and eligibility.
Funding and Authorities: The resolution itself does not allocate funding but facilitates the legislative process for the aforementioned bills, which may have budgetary implications depending on their outcomes.
Beneficiaries and Regulators: The measures primarily affect consumers, financial institutions, and voters. The CFPB’s rules impact consumer financial protections, while the voter registration amendment affects potential voters.
Key Timelines: The latest action on HRES 294 was the motion to reconsider, which was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating a procedural step in the legislative process. Further timelines will depend on subsequent actions taken on the associated bills.
Yea (213)
B
Brad Finstad
M
Mark Green
A
Abraham Hamadeh
M
Mark Harris
B
Brian Jack
B
Brad Knott
C
Celeste Maloy
A
Addison McDowell
D
David Taylor
Nay (211)
A
André Carson
G
Gerald Connolly
A
April McClain Delaney
E
Emilia Sykes
