H.Res.878 — Disapproving the behavior of Representative Jesus G. “Chuy” Garcia of Illinois
House Roll Call
H.Res.878
| Bill | H.Res.878 — Disapproving the behavior of Representative Jesus G. “Chuy” Garcia of Illinois |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Agreeing to the Resolution |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 236 / Nay 183 / Present 4 / Not Voting 10 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 213 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| D | 23 | 183 | 3 | 5 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Bill Analysis
HRES 878, introduced in the 119th Congress, is a resolution aimed at disapproving the behavior of Representative Jesús G. “Chuy” García from Illinois. The resolution serves as a formal expression of disapproval by the House of Representatives regarding specific actions or conduct attributed to García.
The resolution does not allocate funding or create new authorities, as it is primarily a statement of the House’s stance on an individual member’s behavior. It reflects the House’s ability to hold its members accountable for actions that may be deemed inappropriate or contrary to the standards expected of elected officials.
The resolution affects the legislative environment by reinforcing the norms of conduct expected from members of Congress. It serves as a mechanism for the House to address perceived misconduct and uphold ethical standards within its ranks. While it does not impose direct regulations or penalties, it contributes to the broader discourse on accountability and integrity among elected officials.
The primary beneficiaries of HRES 878 are constituents and the general public, who expect transparency and ethical behavior from their representatives. By disapproving of García’s actions, the resolution aims to maintain public trust in the legislative process and the integrity of elected officials.
Key timelines for the resolution include its introduction and subsequent actions taken by the House. The latest action, a motion to reconsider, was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating that the House chose not to revisit the matter further. This procedural step suggests that the resolution’s disapproval stands as a definitive statement from the House regarding García’s behavior, although it does not lead to any formal disciplinary measures or consequences.
Yea (236)
B
Brad Finstad
B
Brandon Gill
A
Abraham Hamadeh
M
Mark Harris
B
Brian Jack
B
Brad Knott
C
Celeste Maloy
A
Addison McDowell
D
David Taylor
Nay (183)
A
André Carson
A
April McClain Delaney
E
Emilia Sykes
