H.Con.Res.3 — Expressing the sense of Congress condemning the recent attacks on pro-life facilities, groups, and churches.
House Roll Call
H.Con.Res.3
| Bill | H.Con.Res.3 — Expressing the sense of Congress condemning the recent attacks on pro-life facilities, groups, and churches. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Agreeing to the Resolution |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 222 / Nay 209 / Present 0 / Not Voting 3 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 219 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 3 | 209 | 0 | 0 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Bill Analysis
HCONRES 3, introduced in the 118th Congress, is a concurrent resolution that expresses the sense of Congress condemning recent attacks on pro-life facilities, organizations, and churches. The resolution highlights a series of incidents characterized by vandalism, threats, and violence directed at entities that advocate for anti-abortion positions.
The resolution does not allocate funding or create new authorities but serves as a formal statement of congressional disapproval regarding these acts of violence and intimidation. It aims to raise awareness of the issue and signal the importance of protecting the rights of all organizations, regardless of their stance on abortion.
Key agencies affected by this resolution include law enforcement entities at both the federal and state levels, which may be called upon to investigate and respond to such attacks. The resolution indirectly impacts pro-life organizations and their affiliates, as well as religious institutions that may face similar threats.
Beneficiaries of this resolution include pro-life advocates and organizations who seek to operate without fear of violence or harassment, as well as communities that value the protection of diverse viewpoints in public discourse. The resolution emphasizes the need for a safe environment for all groups to express their beliefs and engage in advocacy.
The latest action on HCONRES 3 occurred when it was received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary for further consideration. While the resolution does not have the force of law, its passage in either chamber would serve as a significant symbolic gesture of congressional support for the protection of pro-life entities against violence and intimidation. The timeline for any further action remains uncertain, pending deliberation by the Senate committee.
Yea (222)
K
Kelly Armstrong
D
Dan Bishop
K
Ken Buck
L
Larry Bucshon
M
Michael Burgess
J
Jerry Carl
L
Lori Chavez-DeRemer
J
John Duarte
J
Jeff Duncan
A
A. Ferguson
B
Brad Finstad
M
Mike Gallagher
M
Mike Garcia
B
Bob Good
K
Kay Granger
G
Garret Graves
M
Mark Green
B
Bill Johnson
D
Doug Lamborn
J
Jake LaTurner
D
Debbie Lesko
B
Blaine Luetkemeyer
K
Kevin McCarthy
P
Patrick McHenry
M
Marcus Molinaro
A
Alexander Mooney
G
Greg Pence
C
Cathy Rodgers
M
Matthew Rosendale
G
George Santos
M
Michelle Steel
C
Chris Stewart
M
Michael Waltz
B
Brad Wenstrup
B
Brandon Williams
Nay (209)
C
Colin Allred
E
Earl Blumenauer
J
Jamaal Bowman
C
Cori Bush
Y
Yadira Caraveo
T
Tony Cárdenas
A
André Carson
M
Matt Cartwright
D
David Cicilline
G
Gerald Connolly
A
Anna Eshoo
B
Brian Higgins
J
Jeff Jackson
S
Sheila Jackson Lee
D
Daniel Kildee
D
Derek Kilmer
A
Ann Kuster
B
Barbara Lee
K
Kathy Manning
G
Grace Napolitano
W
Wiley Nickel
B
Bill Pascrell
D
Donald Payne
M
Mary Peltola
D
Dean Phillips
K
Katie Porter
C
C. Ruppersberger
J
John Sarbanes
A
Abigail Spanberger
E
Emilia Sykes
D
David Trone
J
Jennifer Wexton
S
Susan Wild
