Nathaniel Freeman was an American physician and politician who lived from 1741 to 1827 and was active in public life during the formative years of the United States. Born in 1741, he came of age in the British North American colonies at a time of growing political tension that would culminate in the American Revolution. Although detailed records of his early childhood and family background are sparse, his later prominence as both a physician and a public official indicates that he received a substantial education for his era and was integrated into the civic and professional networks that shaped colonial and early national society.
Freeman’s education was directed toward the practice of medicine, a profession that in the eighteenth century combined formal study, apprenticeship, and practical experience. By the time of the Revolutionary period, he was established as a physician, providing medical care in a context where trained practitioners were relatively few and communities relied heavily on those with recognized expertise. His medical work would have involved treating a wide range of illnesses and injuries, often with limited resources, while also contending with the broader public health challenges of a growing population and recurring epidemics.
In addition to his medical practice, Freeman entered public life as a politician, reflecting the close connection in that era between learned professions and civic leadership. As an American physician and politician, he participated in the political affairs of his community and state during and after the Revolution, when new institutions of self-government were being created and tested. His dual role as a practitioner of medicine and a public official placed him among the class of early American leaders who combined professional expertise with legislative or administrative responsibilities, contributing to the development of public policy and local governance in the new republic.
Freeman’s lifetime, extending from 1741 to 1827, spanned the French and Indian War, the American Revolution, the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, and the early decades of the United States under the new federal system. Living through these transitions, he witnessed and participated in the transformation from colonial subject to citizen of an independent nation. His career as a physician and politician thus unfolded against a backdrop of profound political and social change, in which questions of representation, public welfare, and civic responsibility were central concerns.
Nathaniel Freeman Jr. was an American politician who lived from 1766 to 1800 and belonged to the generation that came of age during the Revolutionary era and the early years of the United States. Born in 1766, he grew up amid the political upheavals that led to independence and the establishment of new state and federal governments. His upbringing in this environment of constitutional experimentation and debate helped shape his later engagement in public affairs.
As an American politician, Freeman Jr. entered public life at a time when the structures of governance were still being defined and tested. His political career unfolded in the last decades of the eighteenth century, when issues such as the balance between state and federal authority, the organization of the judiciary, and the development of stable financial and administrative systems were at the forefront of public debate. Within this context, he served in elected or appointed capacities that placed him within the broader cohort of early American officeholders responsible for implementing and refining the new constitutional order.
Freeman Jr.’s service as a politician during this period would have involved participation in legislative deliberations, the consideration of laws necessary to give effect to constitutional principles, and engagement with the concerns of his constituents in a rapidly changing society. His career, though cut short by his death in 1800, coincided with the presidencies of George Washington and John Adams and the emergence of the first party system, situating him within the formative political struggles of the early republic. His life and work thus reflected the opportunities and challenges faced by the first generation of American political leaders after independence.
Congressional Record





